Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jim Henman's avatar

Thank you John Wesley for this . I have always thought a country should add the Buddhist version to the narrowness in thought of the GDP. The Buddhist approach to measuring a country's state focuses on well-being and happiness rather than GDP. Bhutan's Gross National Happiness (GNH) exemplifies this, encompassing dimensions like psychological well-being, health, education, time use, cultural diversity, good governance, community vitality, ecological resilience, and living standards. This holistic method aims for a balanced and harmonious society, valuing more than just economic growth.

Jim

Expand full comment
David Cameron's avatar

but, doesn't it matter who comes & stays? Immigrants all have to find jobs & pay for food/clothing/shelter/communications...adding to the GDP, eh? Is it the substantial numbers of retirees from ON and points west, moving to NS that are the "dead-weight" in the equation? Even those have to spend $ to live ( and buy/build properties). Is pension & interest income counted in determining GDP? I don' get it. Is inflation just a wash & doesn't count? I'd think the inflation $ going out of Province to Rogers & Westons, Irving & Waltons, Loblaws & etc., would be a drain on NS GDP.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts